Random picture of Sacto LR I took a few years ago
Just goes to show that rail transit really can work, even in a city that developed through decades of auto-oriented sprawl.
So VTA, what's your excuse?
I expect a big part of Sacto LR's success is that routes are fairly straight, reasonably fast (transit doesn't have to run at bullet-train speeds, or even be faster than driving--just don't make it painfully, insultingly slow), and building lines to run where people actually want to go.
Pretty basic stuff, but you'd be surprised how often transit "professionals" overlook these factors!
For more insight into the capitol city scene, I recommend reading these blogs:
2 comments:
LRT from Winchester to Diridon is reasonably fast. It's going from San Jose to Mountain View that's truly pitiful.
I agree about the Winchester/Campbell line--goes pretty much in a straight line, on a dedicated right of way, right to CalTrain and then downtown.
And every time I've ridden it, the trains have been decently full (unlike Tasman West, which in off-peak hours can be downright lonely!).
I expect that ridership in the new line will increase, too, since I see a *lot* development going in around stations.
The final leg between CalTrain and downtown SJ is still roundabout and annoying, though. It's convenient if you're going to the Childrens' Discovery Museum (which we've done), but I think just heading straight east on San Carlos or Santa Clara would get the vast majority of riders to where they want to be about 5 mins quicker.
That's nitpicking, though. I just wish the rest of the system had been built as sensibly as this line.
Post a Comment