|
 
295busAdventures & Opinions in Bay Area Transit
Opinion: Can we Build our Way out of Gridlock? TWAYBYB No Train Ride to Petaluma Yet How Stupid Are We So where are we Supposed to Live Then? Fun: Where to Eat Redwood City to Mountain View, the Long Way Recent Posts: - Lizards - Sacramento Light Rail Ridership up 43% - Bike-to-Work Day - Out for Dinner in San Mateo - Citizen's Advisory Committees - In the Interest of Full Disclosure - Trader Joe's Needs More Parking - A Well-Applied Internet Meme - Happy National Train Day! - BART Debate in the Merc Post Archives: - May 2006 - June 2006 - July 2006 - August 2006 - September 2006 - October 2006 - November 2006 - December 2006 - January 2007 - February 2007 - March 2007 - April 2007 - May 2007 - June 2007 - July 2007 - August 2007 - September 2007 - October 2007 - November 2007 - December 2007 - January 2008 - February 2008 - March 2008 - April 2008 - May 2008 My Other Pages: - NKNCat -- My other, less serious blog about model trolleys - Trolley Postcards Transit, Biking & Urban Blogs: - CityTransit Blog Aggergator - VTAWatch - MetroRiderLA - The N-Judah Chronicles - Militant Angeleno - The Overhead Wire - Cyclelicio.us Transit Organizations: - Bay Rail Alliance - Train Riders' Association of California - Transportation & Land Use Coalition - Rescue Muni - San Francisco Planning & Urban Research - Muni Haiku My Friends' Pages: - Issues with Stuff - Fans of Reality TV - The Adventure Chronicles - Anthro-Ling Hit Counter
|
LizardsSunday, May 18, 2008
A week or two ago I biked to work via Alameda/Junipero Sera/Foothill. Somewhere along the back of Stanford, I saw a couple of lizards by the side of the road.
posted by 295bus at 9:05 PM
While I took this guy's picture, his buddy made a break for it across the road, and got squished by a car :( So I yelled and waved my arms and chased this one back into the bushes. Folks who live up in Portola Valley, Woodside, the hills of PA, MP and RWC zip along these roads, driving up to live in the "country" because they love nature, right? Sacramento Light Rail Ridership up 43%Wednesday, May 14, 2008
Since last year (!). They did open a new line (to Folsom), which helps boost statistics, but overall they must be doing something essentially right too. LRT ridership is now higher than bus ridership.
posted by 295bus at 12:12 PM
Just goes to show that rail transit really can work, even in a city that developed through decades of auto-oriented sprawl. So VTA, what's your excuse? I expect a big part of Sacto LR's success is that routes are fairly straight, reasonably fast (transit doesn't have to run at bullet-train speeds, or even be faster than driving--just don't make it painfully, insultingly slow), and building lines to run where people actually want to go. Pretty basic stuff, but you'd be surprised how often transit "professionals" overlook these factors! For more insight into the capitol city scene, I recommend reading these blogs:
Bike-to-Work Day
is tomorrow.
posted by 295bus at 11:29 AM
I think I'll try biking all the way in. The VTA is going to have an "energizer station" for bikers set up at the Mountain View station, from 6:30 to 9:30. Score some freebies! Guess I'll be missing that, since I don't usually get out of the house that early (w@h, as we say...). Have fun, and expect CalTrain bike cars to be a little extra-crowded (those of you in the habit of working standard work ours might want to think about shifting to a "slacker schedule" for a day, if your job lets you get away with it!). Out for Dinner in San MateoMonday, May 12, 2008
The other night my wife went out with some friends, so I gave my daughter a heads up that if homework was done by the time I got home, we could go out too, and it got done in record time.
posted by 295bus at 8:37 PM
I thought my plans would be moot due to an unusual but thankfully non-fatal bike/train incident messing up CalTrain that evening, but trains were quickly back on schedule. We headed up to San Mateo. I had a silly notion to go to that Mexican place with the ads starring the dorky kid, but we ended up at North Beach Pizza, where I got Chicken Marsala and my daughter got plain old spaghetti. I've linked to Yelp, but here's our review:
Citizen's Advisory Committees
There is
an opening on the CalTrain CAC. Applications are due by Wednesday at 5 PM.
posted by 295bus at 10:14 AM
I've applied for this in the past (as well as the SamTrans board), never gotten on... perhaps they've read this blog and are wary of angry rants. Probably what I should really be aiming for is getting more involved in an unofficial way (but in real life, rather than the internet). The CalTrain CAC announcement mentions that meetings are open to the public. I oughta show up some time. In related news, I was pleased to read this announcement from Peter Ehrlich in his SFMuniHistory Yahoo group:
Perhaps now is the time for me to announce that I've received an appointment by the SF County Transportation Commission (that's the Board of Supes wearing a different hat) to the Citizen's Advisory Panel for Geary BRT. I was chosen to fill one of the At-Large seats. Supervisor Bevan Dufty liked my background and experience as a transit operator, and I think I can draw on that experience to help design this project.Peter is a retired F Line motorman. Members of the Market St Ry will have seen examples of Peter's excellent photography in their newsletter; he is also a knowledgeable transit historian. It's nice to see experience getting the appreciation it deserves (not really that common in the transit field, unfortuntely). In the Interest of Full DisclosureSaturday, May 10, 2008
We bought a new car. Well, new to us, anyway! (Which puts us in a much nicer class of car than we'd ever buy new; it's an Audi.)
posted by 295bus at 9:36 PM
The day after we bought it, I drove it to work to show it off to my friends. On the way home I was reminded of the fact that I don't commute by bike and train for idealistic reasons alone--traffic sucks! Since then I've been been back on the bike and CalTrain like usual. It's also more fun to meet up with my family after work that way--if I come by car, I have to drive it home by myself. Our previous "unenlightened tranport" was a minivan, which had the advantage that when I meet up with my familty somewhere, it was easy to load up a bike. I've been keeping a bike rack in the truck of the new car, but it takes up a lot of room that really needs to be used for groceries and ice skates. I guess I'll be shopping for a bike rack that compacts better (and hopefully goes on more quickly). Trader Joe's Needs More ParkingFriday, May 09, 2008
See, every spot's taken!
posted by 295bus at 11:06 PM
A Well-Applied Internet MemeWednesday, May 07, 2008posted by 295bus at 10:09 PMHappy National Train Day!
AmTrak has declared May 10th National Train Day.
posted by 295bus at 11:13 AM
There are events scheduled at train stations around the country. Doesn't sound like anything around here will top what they've got planned for NY, Chicago, or LA, but there'll be stuff going on at several BA stations, including Emeryville, Martinez, and San Francisco (I think this means the AmTrak bus stop by the Ferry Building, not the CalTrain station--which is kinda lame, but might make it obscure enought to increase your chance of scoring freebies!). BART Debate in the MercTuesday, May 06, 2008
Gary Richards, aka "Mr Roadshow", recently printed a batch of letters pro and con the BART/SJ project in his column, including one by yours truly. It got edited down a bit... here's what I actually wrote:
posted by 295bus at 11:14 PM
Who but the VTA would be upset that they "only" have $8.7 billion? Some of the other writers has interesting things to say, too! :) It's good to see some actual public discussion of this issue, and the Merc printing more than the BARTista line fed to it by the SVLG. Thanks to Richard Masoner of Cyclelicio.US for pointing this article out to me. For further reading on BART-to-SJ, I recommend VTAWatch, who puts it better than me. Am I Wrong?
A week ago Saturday the Daily News published a letter of mine about the proposed redevelopment of the Redwood City saltworks.
posted by 295bus at 11:05 PM
Dear Editor: Over the next few months, we can expect to hear a lot about "preserving open space" from the anti-growth crowd in Redwood City, who oppose any new development of our saltworks. I find their "green cred" somewhat suspect, not just because a lot of them live quite nicely on former open space themselves in Emerald Hills (which once was grasslands, oaks and redwood forest), and put their share of CO2 into the atmosphere getting up there, but because their "housing not high-rises" campaign of 2004, which had the net effect of preserving a row of auto dealerships and a boat-storage lot, exposed their true concerns: preserving "their" city from the threat of new residents moving here in large numbers. I've gotten some flack over this from some folks whose opinion I respect, who ask why I'm supporting a project that:
I can accept (1) as a reasonable argument, though I think I've made my position clear--the saltworks aren't really a natural space any more, and getting half a wetlands is better than none. As to (2), my political roots are pretty far left, and I'm sympathetic--but it just seems orthogonal to the issue at hand. Regarding (3), perhaps I am hasty in endorsing this project, but others are equally hasty in condemning it. Naturally I take (4) a more seriously. So is this project transit oriented? Admittedly, it's a ways from CalTrain. Here's a map, with some additions of mine.
The developers are happy to point out that the area is close to the planned Redwood City Ferry terminal, but prospects for that project are dimming (and probably it's a dumb idea). My $0.02 is that this area is ripe for some sort of local Bus Rapid Transit line to connect it to the core of Redwood City and Sequoia Station. This should be done already to better connect to the Seaport Office complex (those big towers out next to the cement plant). Done right, it would only be about a 10-15 min ride. How well this would actually work out depends on the extent to which new development was actually organized around it, and its degree of pedestrian-friendliness. A few musings...
One thing I would truly love to hear from opponents of the Saltworks project is an admission that Redwood City needs more housing--and a suggestion of a better place to put it. I don't mean this rhetorically!!! I think there really are other places around town ripe for redevelopment. Our KMart is pretty deserted--tear it down, build some apartments/condos/townhomes, whatever, and make room for a couple hundred new Redwood City families... but hey, it's not my job to think up alternatives to turning the Saltworks into housing--people who are against this project should be doing that! We need to move beyond "veto politics" to actively looking for solutions to problems, and for a change, getting people to be for something. What do you think? It sucks, but the "Proposition Q" project that RWC voters defeated in 2004 was all around a better project--it was denser, closer to the city's core, and was set on land already lost to development (and nothing anyone would miss). What's the Opposite of SMART?Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit, or SMART, is a proposed commuter (DMU) line linking Cloverdale, in the far north of Sonoma County, with Larkspur in Marin, via the dormant tracks of the Northwestern Pacific Railway.
posted by 295bus at 1:29 PM
In the November 2006 election, a sales tax to support it barely missed the 2/3 supermajority needed to pass it. It sailed through in Sonoma county, but floundered in Marin, due to concerted opposition by train-haters in Novato, suspect environmentalists concerned that trains might disturb wildlife, and the usual assortment of exurban NIMBY cranks. I wrote an analysis of the SMART initiative's future prospects here. SMART will be back on the ballot this November, and I'm optimistic about its prospects, since a presidential election usually gets the right sort of people (from my perspective!) to the polls, and two years of sitting in traffic on the 101 have probably changed a few minds (reconstruction of the 101/580 interchange in San Rafael, and its resulting traffic snarls, has hopefully reinforced the futility of highway improvements). To their credit the SMART board and SMART backers have gone on the offensive to counter some of the arguments and disinformation that defeated their 2006 initiative. I recommend a look at their new website, which not only has good information about SMART, but a nice analysis of what makes different transportation modes cost-effective (anyone who still likes BART-to-SJ should really read this!). Great! But how can those of us outside of the North Bay help out? I have an idea--playing off of SMART's acronym, I'm launching an acronym contest of my own.
Come up with an unflattering acronym for people who oppose SMART. Here's some suggestions to kick it off:
Think up stuff, post your ideas as comments! In the spirit of open-source development, everyone should feel free to cannibalize from previous suggestions and improve on them.
Halleluyah!Monday, April 28, 2008
This article from the Chron was both amusing and sad.
posted by 295bus at 12:34 PM
Before I go totally sarcastic here, Mr Twyman's work on organ and tissue donation seems like a genuinely good thing, and I'll give him some credit for acknowledging that ordinary people can take some responsibility for their transportation problems. Ok, now that I've gotten that out of the way... I'd like to give Mr Twyman the good news: God has already solved my transportation problems for me--by giving me a pair of working legs! True, my job is a little farther from my house than I'd care to walk, but combine those legs with a bike, add a train-ride, and problem solved. The Lord helps those who help themselves, I guess! Seriously, though, just how many ways is this pray-in stupid? Twyman seems to think:
To a shorter, and less vitriolic version of this post that I emailed to the Chronicle, Mr Baker responded:
Amen. Time to Place your Last BetsTuesday, April 22, 2008
The San Mateo council has approved the redevelopment of the Bay Meadows site into a mixed-used, transit oriented, somewhat-dense urban area.
posted by 295bus at 10:08 AM
This is generally a good thing. And I am pretty darn certain that the groups in opposition to this project have nearly zero interest in horse-racing, and consist of the usual assortment of selfish NIMBY's cranks. As for me, I have actually been to the races once. It was fun (I won $100 on a $5 bet, by total luck, I can assure you), and I'm going to make sure to get out there with my family one more time before it closes. And it looks like we're going to have to do it pretty soon, because apparently things are shutting down for good in just a couple of weeks.
What's sad is that this doesn't really have to be an either-or situation. If you look at a Google maps satellite view of the Bay Meadows site,
you see that half of the property is actually taken up by parking. Suppose we just start assuming that everyone who wants to bet on horses gets there by train--we could keep the racetrack, and still open up several acres for development. Suppose also we threw in the San Mateo County "fairgrounds", the parcel to the NW of Bay Meadows--currently just a couple of big convention-hall buildings with their own sea of parking. The convention hall function could remain, but the halls could be built with housing or businesses above, or like the Mascone Center, there could be a park on top. When we talk about the cars, the main evils we think of are pollution and traffic, but there are other downsides to car-dependence--the perceived need for parking is a kind of tax--it at least doubles the amount of land that a business or institution requires, and squeezes some of them out of our region entirely, including ones--like horse racing--that it might be fun to keep around. ImprovisingThursday, April 17, 2008
All too often, public agencies' solution to any problem is based around spending money. For example, about ten years ago, the VTA decided that it's light rail fleet should be low-floor, to improve accessibility (before that, wheelchair lifts were used, like on CalTrain). So they bought an entirely new fleet, even though their original LRVs were less than half-way through their service life.
posted by 295bus at 12:21 PM
So it's kind of refreshing to see a transit agency improvise occasionally, and come up with clever solutions. Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) is solving the same problem VTA had in a novel way--by splicing low-floor sections into existing articulated LRVs, increasing overall capacity in the process as well. Here's an article in Metro Magazine.
VTA's foolishness was a boon to a few other transit systems, who saw an opportunity to increase capacity by buying some perfectly good used trains at bargain prices. Some ex-VTA cars are now enjoying a second career in Salt Lake City (others are on the property in Sacramento, but haven't actually been pressed into service yet). In the late 90's, CalTrain picked up some used equipment (some 2nd hand from Chicago Metra, some with a much longer and interesting history) to add capacity during the dot-com boom. They unloaded all of this after the arrival of the new Bombardier cars. Too bad, since the trains are getting pretty crowded again lately! Not Easy being a Biker in Woodside--Even if you Live There!Wednesday, April 16, 2008
According to a Menlo Park Almanac story (can't find it on their web site), the Woodside council has approved reducing the community bike committee from seven members to six, because it's proving hard to find seven bikers in town to fill it--or even enough to show up and have a quorum if the official committee size stays at seven.
posted by 295bus at 1:59 PM
According to the article, it's hard to recruit to the committee because identifying yourself as a biker in Woodside gets you ostracized from dinner parties, and because the Town Council pretty consistently snubs their recommendations (for bike lanes, pot-hole repair, designating safe routes for kids to bike to school, etc) anyway. Marin is EvilTuesday, April 15, 2008
From the Independent Journal:
posted by 295bus at 8:47 AM
Larkspur has real reason to fear rail-ferry linkHere's a somewhat more radical suggestion: local government, especially in hoity-toidy places like Marin (and quote a lot of San Mateo county, to be sure!) have places such a high value on ambiance, and shown such total disregard to the housing and transportation needs of the community at large, that they have lost the moral authority to do their own planning. So take it away from them. Odd CombinationMonday, April 14, 2008
Seen forgotten (or temporarily walked-away-from?) at Menlo Park CalTrain:
posted by 295bus at 9:51 PM
I'm curious what sort of person reads gritty detective novels, thoughtful books about the Vietnam war
"They carried all the emotional baggage of men who might die. Grief, terror, love, longing--these were intangibles, but the intangibles had their own mass and specific gravity, they had tangible weight. They carried shameful memories. They carried the common secret of cowardice.... Men killed, and died, because they were embarrassed not to."(I'm lifting this from the Amazon review page)... and drinks Strawberry Quick! Lunch in Silicon ValleyTuesday, April 08, 2008
I had to run down to Sunnyvale today. I'm having lunch at Le Boulanger on Mathilda, which has free Wifi.
posted by 295bus at 12:43 PM
It's darn crowded here. It seems to be an old-school Silicon Valley crowd. The guys next to me are talking about frame rates and registers. I'm guessing they work on cell phones. Now they're switching over to aerodynamics and heat guns. I think this is more a topic of general interest than professional. It's a bit refreshing compared to the the dot-com/business chatter you overhear going out for lunch up the road in Mountain View. I swear I'm keeping half of this sandwich for later. (I got here by CalTrain and bike, thus qualifying this anecdote for posting on this blog). Don't Blink!Monday, April 07, 2008
On a grim note, someone used CalTrain to end their life this morning. At least thanks to the rider-run CalTrain Twitter Feed I knew what was up before I left the house, and was able to avoid the hassle of a disrupted train service and bike the whole way.
posted by 295bus at 11:06 PM
The most direct route takes me across Stanford, where I passed this statue of a weeping angel.
If you are a fan of Doctor Who, this may creep you out a bit and remind of you a bit of this episode. There is an interesting history to this statue. I'm going on scattered memory here, but I believe it was originally a memorial to the Stanfords' son, who died young, and for whom the university is named (that's why it's Leland Stanford Junior University). It was originally under a dome, which collapsed in the 1906 earthquake. It was decided to leave it without the dome, letting it in part become a memorial to victims of the earthquake. | |||||||||||